Reparations have become a recent topic in the House of Representatives again as Democrats push for consideration of HR 40. A hearing on HR 40 was held before the House Judiciary subcommittee with Senator Cory Booker testifying. HR 40 is the counterpart to the American Opportunity Accounts Act that Booker has submitted in the Senate. Reparations are only one piece of the legislation, that advocates for free $1,000 savings bonds for each child born in the US with additions added each year up to age 18.
The second part of the legislation makes the case that reparations should be paid to the descendants of slaves to make right the wrong of slavery. The argument is that the country as a whole has done the descendants of slaves wrong and should pay for that wrong. The problem is, not everyone that is alive in the United States is to blame for slavery. There were many families in the past that did not own slaves and holding them accountable for what others did seems a little reckless doesn’t it?
Mitch McConnell made great comments on Tuesday when he commented that these things occurred over 150 years ago. Those currently alive are not directly responsible and should not be forced to pay reparations. I also agree with his statements that we have come a long way as a society since slavery. I do believe McConnell made a mistake and the media and Democrats were quick to jump on it. McConnell suggested that the election of President Obama helped atone for the sins of slavery. I don’t think it atones for slavery, but it certainly is an indicator of how far we have come.
Let’s get back to the reparations. Michael Knowles, at the Daily Wire, has a great article how one of the first slave owners was actually black. He poses the question, do his descendants receive reparations just for being black? Where do we draw the line? CNN’s Don Lemon suggests that anyone disagreeing with reparations is approaching the subject from a racist viewpoint. The subject is not a racist argument, but one of simple logic.
The program to determine who is and who is not eligible for reparations would take a government program that would cost millions of dollars to fund. The research would take years and who knows if it could even be fully completed. Secondly, how do we determine the extent to which someone’s life has suffered as part of their ancestors slavery? Do we owe reparations to Oprah Winfrey, Michael Jordan, Denzel Washington, or others?
Then comes the question of how we determine who is responsible. Many individuals in the Appalachia region are just as poor as the minorities that are discussed as deserving reparations. Do these individuals, who would have not been “privileged” enough to own slaves in the past deserve to pay for the past of others? Again, countless years of research and government funding to make this determination.
The fact is, it would be impossible in our lifetimes to undertake and complete such a thorough research of reparations and appropriately address them. As a country, we have owned the fact that slavery is an disgrace and we have made efforts to change. I know that many will disagree with me, but sometimes simply admitting you made a mistake and moving on is the best response.
You can contact JD through the Liberty Loft website or by Twitter.
295626 197709Dead written articles , appreciate it for entropy. 21134
Has our society succumbed to this? Have Americans become people that believe that money is the great equalizer and cure-all? I’m afraid we may have! Daily, American courts are awarding astronomical jury awards for negligent acts – most recently, a “Crazy California Court” awarded 2-billion dollar jury award against Monsanto, a Bayer company. According to the San Franciso court, Alva and Alberta Pilliod of Livermore, Calif., contracted non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma because of their use of the glyphosate-based herbicide. They were each awarded $1 billion in punitive damages and an additional $55 million in collective compensatory damages. So, how should this award be viewed? How much money is enough to say, “I’m Sorry?”
Regarding reparations, as a country, when is enough, enough? Let’s be frank, throughout our young history, every minority has been discriminated against – Irish Catholics, Native, and Japanese-Americans, etc. Should these individuals also be included? American today has gone over and above attempting to the right the wrongs of slavery – with race-based funding of social programs and Affirmative-Action, minorities today, have been awarded countless opportunities, often ahead of white-Americans, solely based on their skin. Let us not forget that Barak Obama was elected as the first African-American president – with a majority of white-Americans voting in favor of his misleading and backward policies. These numbers cannot be overlooked – according to the 2010 Census, African-Americans make up just 14-percent of the US population. Without question,14-percent didn’t win Obama 8-years in the White House. So, who made up the difference – white Americans!
So, where does it end? How much is too much – or too little? Is $1,000 enough to say, I’m sorry for the mistakes of my great, great, great ancestors? I, nor my family has ever owned slaves..and I do not know an individual or family that has. If $1,000 is indeed the magic number, should we award it to living minorities, or do we look at those individuals who have left this earth and grant it to their families? After all, it would have been those generations that endured the pain and torture brought upon by slavery – not some 21-year old millennial laying on his parent’s couch blaming his skin color for his lack of employment and opportunity, instead of taking accountability for his/her irresponsible behavior. Better yet, if $1,000 is enough, should we as a country pull the plug on the existing social programs and Affirmative-Action that CLEARLY isn’t enough to say – “I’m Sorry!”