Washington, D.C. — On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to reconsider legal immunity from lawsuits given to police and other public officials accused of misconduct.
The SCOTUS blog tweeted the following: #SCOTUS also turns down group of cases involving doctrine of qualified immunity, which shield officials from liability for constitutional violations that do not violate clearly established law”
#SCOTUS also turns down group of cases involving doctrine of qualified immunity, which shields officials from liability for constitutional violations that do not violate clearly established law
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 15, 2020
The justices’ decision not to hear a case on qualified immunity in their next term, which will begin in October, following the death last month of George Floyd. Floyd’s killing has led to days of riots and peaceful protests in Minneapolis and across the U.S. and a renewed national debate about racism and police brutality.
The Court has always set a high threshold for pursuing lawsuits over official misconduct. Officers’ behavior must violate “clearly established” laws or constitutional rights, and courts have found it seldom does, because almost every specific allegation is different.
Lower court judges and scholars on both the Left and the Right have questioned that legal doctrine for creating a nearly impossible standard for victims to meet and a nearly blanket immunity for those accused of misconduct.
The doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in 1982 and has been expanded over time. Increasingly, the top court has required victims to cite a case with precisely the same detailed facts as their own in order to prove that the action against them was a clearly established violation of the law.
Justices Clarence Thomas, one of the court’s most conservative justices, and Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal, have both criticized qualified immunity on separate grounds.
CNBC has reported that, “Thomas has argued that qualified immunity is essentially a creation of the justices — substituting ‘our own policy preferences’ for that of Congress. Sotomayor has written that qualified immunity ‘tells officers that they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished.'”
In a dissent from the court’s decision not to hear one of the qualified immunity cases it was considering, Thomas reiterated his opposition to the doctrine.
Thomas wrote, “There likely is no basis for the objective inquiry into clearly established law that our modern cases prescribe. Leading treatises from the second half of the 19th century and case law until the 1980s contain no support for this ‘clearly established law’ test.”
You can contact Bennett through The Liberty Loft’s website. Be sure to subscribe to The Liberty Loft’s daily newsletter. If you enjoy our content, please consider donating to support The Liberty Loft so we can continue to deliver great content.
817215 947776hey there, your web site is great. I do thank you for work 998254
347795 917715Id should verify with you here. Which isnt something I often do! I enjoy studying a publish that can make folks think. Also, thanks for permitting me to remark! 662218
539071 372931Perfect just what I was looking for! . 236577
638532 343716I see your point, and I completely appreciate your post. For what its worth I will tell all my friends about it, quite resourceful. Later. 80348
139432 416476Should you tow a definite caravan nor van movie trailer your entire family pretty soon get exposed to the down sides towards preventing greatest securely region. awnings 952868
This is an important article, in particular its recognition that a key to Russian success is Russia’s willingness to size its commitments to its aim and cut its losses rather than double down when confronted with failure. It’s a lesson that we seem incapable of learning.
913253 822845Hi, you used to write outstanding articles, but the last several posts have been kinda boring I miss your super writing. Past several posts are just a bit out of track! 968258
516902 59406Heya just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know some of the pictures arent loading properly. Im not confident why but I think its a linking concern. Ive tried it in two different internet browsers and both show exactly the same outcomes. 24326
848755 536031Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in truth used to be a amusement account it. Glance complex to much more added agreeable from you! Nonetheless, how could we be in contact? 697504
728973 50907Your weblog is showing far more interest and enthusiasm. Thank you so much. 20046
491718 305665Outstanding post, I conceive people need to larn a good deal from this weblog its quite user friendly . 472410