WASHINGTON — As two high-profile cases are before the Supreme Court, the liberal justices are approaching their questioning not from a basis of law, but rather one of public arguments.
In arguments over CMS rulings and regulations, the liberal justices stated that the vaccines were more important because they could prevent the vaccine.
Justices provided examples that were much different from the current COVID pandemic, arguing that the vaccines would help protect those who may get sick from COVID if the vaccines were not mandated. But that argument is not based on fact, but rather an opinion.
So far, COVID vaccines have proven ineffective at preventing the spread of COVID as the Justices seemed to indicate. Breakthrough cases are becoming the norm with the current Omicron variant.
Justices used the regulation of wearing gloves as an argument about vaccines. They claim that because the use of gloves are required in clinics, why can the vaccines not be mandated.
In later questioning by Kavanaugh, it was argued that gloves and masks can come off, but vaccines are forever.
The arguments are being made over whether CMS, the federal agency with oversight of healthcare groups, has the authority to implement vaccine mandates. CMS has to operate within the guidelines given to it by Congress, but groups opposing the mandate argue that vaccine mandates go well beyond their authority.
Arguments continued as the Justices questioned the reach of the federal ruling. Liberal justices continued to argue that if the federal government wants to purchase services and mandate vaccines for the services they receive, then they have that ability.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh commented how unique the situation appeared to be in that the groups being regulated were not present arguing against the regulation. He argued that hospitals seem to support the regulation from CMS, but they were not present arguing against the regulation. Justice Thomas also commented on this element in his questioning.
The two vaccine mandates are both before the Supreme Court today as the court will determine the fate of Biden’s decrees that will affect over 80 million Americans.
Did you know that you could make a big difference in conservative media? With a small donation or recurring monthly donation, you can help sustain The Liberty Loft and help us reach Americans with the truth that mainstream media refuses to share. You can donate via PayPal or with crypto.
You can find The Liberty Loft on a wide variety of social media channels or subscribe to our e-mail list to receive content direct to your inbox each day.
In the context of this case, Sotomayor made some really stupid and uninformed comments about Covid and the Omicron variant, proving that she is a mainstream news junkie. But worse than that, it’s not her place, or anyone on SCOTUS, to make assessments about the virus. They are not doctors or scientists. Their job is to interpret and uphold the Constitution. So not only does she not know what she’s talking about with regard to Covid, but apparently she doesn’t even understand what her job is on the Supreme Court!
The liberal Justices seem to forget that in the United States we have something called The Constitution and as such we cannot be forced into taking any vaccine against our will. If people are forced to do so they must rebel and do whatever they need to do to protect their God given rights.