“As the news cycle continues to focus on the Ukraine situation, the FDA complied with a court order to begin releasing 55,000 pages of Pfizer data per month that was used to authorize their COVID-19 vaccine produced with BioNTech, with the first batch quietly released yesterday, March 1st…. But with everyone watching what is happening in the Ukraine right now, I wonder if anyone is even noticing this?” wrote Brian Shilhavy for Vaccine Impact.
Shilhavy had a chance to review the latest batch of documents released by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with regards to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) related to the approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s Comirnaty jab.
PHMPT is the group that won a legal battle for transparency earlier this year against the FDA with a judge ruling that all documents being sought ultimately be released by the end of this year instead of the 75 years sought by the FDA, which has continued to fight that ruling. The PHMPT has maintained page with all the documents released to date.
One of the interesting documents released this week showed the “user fee” that BioNTech paid the FDA to get approval, and that price was $2.9 million. Although $2.9 million may sound like a lot to us (although it may not go as far these days due to price inflation), that’s a small price to pay for the billions Pfizer and BioNTech will rake in from the DNA altering jabs foisted on society through the crony corporatist Medical Industrial Complex.
Readers may recall the undercover video released by Project Veritas last month in which its journalist got Christopher Cole, an FDA executive, to describe the corrupt relationship between Big Government and Big Pharma. As part of the details, Cole described the “user fees.”
Cole describes the billions of dollars being funneled into the FDA to approve products. He said the FDA “whitewashed” how the user fees impact their decision making.
“They tone down the impact of the user fees on their operations because they know they’re dependent on the drug companies and vaccine companies and these other companies for their agency to operate,” Cole said.
That $2.9 million “user fee,” then, is nothing more than bribe. And its all nothing but blood money considering the more and more evidence coming out proving the dangers of the jabs.
And who was overseeing the studies to make sure the shots were “safe and effective” to take?
Shilhavy pointed out another document in this week’s release detailing the External Data Monitoring Committee (EDMC).
The EDMC is defined in the document as a “single, external, independent, expert advisory group established to oversee safety and efficacy data,” and the “primary rationale for establishing the committee is to make certain that appropriate external safeguards are in place to help ensure the safety of subjects and to maintain scientific rigor and study integrity while the trial is on-going.”
And right below that definition is this: “Pfizer is responsible for conducting this study. BioNTech is the regulatory sponsor of this study.”
Can anyone say conflict of interest? So, Pfizer, the pharmaceutical company, conducts the study and BioNTech, the manufacturer of the jab, regulates it. That leaves just one word: Wow!
