It’s vital to recall that we’d just jumped through the flames of an international credit crisis that began in 2008 and had wreaked havoc on markets for years. The central banks had injected tens of trillions of dollars of stimulus into the system simply to keep it alive.
Some of us in the alternative media concluded that these efforts were intended to zombify the economy through currency devaluation and inflation, rather than to save it. This zombie construct would turn on us and try to eat us alive not long after, and only the central bankers knew what was going on.
Lagarde’s talk at the WEF coincided with Klaus Schwab’s introduction of his 4th Industrial Revolution thesis, which is a step closer to what the globalists actually desire. He extols the benefits of a real “global society” and a world where people look to Artificial Intelligence (AI) for better government. He even goes so far as to say that AI would eventually dictate laws and that robots will govern courts.
Of course, he acknowledges that this would require a time of economic deconstruction during which people and governments will have to choose between sacrifice for the sake of stability and continuing misery in the name of clinging to the “old ways.” Consider the following: The action or chaos is the Great Reset, while the desired consequence or planned “order” is the 4th Industrial Revolution. That is to say, it is a new order born of man-made chaos.
Yes, it sounds like horrible science fiction, but keep in mind that these are the folks who have Many of our political leaders, who mix with the Fed’s central bankers, are paying close attention.
The proponents of the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, who aim to radically destabilize and reconfigure our society and way of life, are close allies of our national leaders and the very bankers who may impose such a reset through an intentional collapse.
For many years, the globalists have been striving to rebrand and repackage their New World Order plan, and the Reset was the result. Rather than sounding harmless, the term implies systemic change and the erasing of the past. When you “reset” something, it usually returns to zero, giving the engineers a clean slate on which to rewrite the code and functionalities. But what exactly does this imply?
What do the globalists REALLY WANT? Just a few things, really:
Total Global Economic Centralization: Some may argue that we already have global economic centralization, but they are misinformed about what this entails. While all national central banks are members of the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements and follow their commands, the globalists seek open global financial regulation, most likely through the IMF.
In other words, it isn’t enough for them to discreetly manage economies through the use of national central banks as proxies; they want to come out into the open as the magnanimous overlords they imagine themselves to be.
Full centralization’s ultimate goal is to eliminate the concept of free markets and allow a small group of individuals to oversee every element of trade and commerce. It’s not just about power; it’s also about economic dominance. However, they must first adopt a one-world currency scheme before they can establish a worldwide central bank.
For years, the IMF has discussed utilizing their SDR basket as the cornerstone for a global currency (since at least the year 2000). Around a decade ago, China began taking on trillions of dollars in debt in order to qualify for membership in the SDR system, and the IMF has intimated that the system will eventually go digital. All that’s required is the appropriate kind of catastrophe to jolt the public into action.
For years, the IMF has discussed utilizing their Special Drawing Rights basket as the cornerstone for a global currency (since at least the year 2000). Around a decade ago, China began taking on trillions of dollars in debt only to be eligible for membership in the SDR system, and the IMF has intimated that the system will eventually go digital. All that is required is the right kind of crisis to jolt the populace into submission.
For a while, the new system would be more akin to a phantom currency. The SDR would act as a glue or a backstop while national currencies are still in use until the digital system is fully implemented. The IMF and its leaders would become the de facto world central bank, with the power to direct the direction of all national economies via an unified currency mechanism.
On the microeconomic level, everyone would now be reliant on digital money or cryptocurrency, which eliminates all trade privacy. All transactions would be tracked, which is necessary given the nature of blockchain technology and the digital ledger. The money elites would only have to claim, “That’s how the technology works; without the ledger, it doesn’t operate,” to explain the tracking.
A Global Social Credit System: During the recent lockdowns and violent push for medical authoritarianism, the evil inherent in globalism was abundantly visible. Despite the fact that dozens of official studies showed that covid had a median Infection Fatality Rate of only 0.27 percent, the WEF contingent of politicians and international leaders were giddy, stating that the existence of covid gave them the right to assume entire control over people’s lives.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) and Klaus Schwab cheerfully stated that the pandemic marked the start of the “Great Reset” and the 4th Industrial Revolution, claiming that the covid crisis provided an ideal “opportunity” for change.
Vaccine passports were thankfully defeated in a number of reactionary red states in the United States, resulting in a complete reversal of such laws throughout much of the Western world. We were free for years while many blue states and other countries faced totalitarianism, which caused the globalists a lot of issues. It’s difficult to impose a worldwide medical dystopia when people all across the world can see that we’re fine without the rules thanks to conservatives in the United States.
The vax passports must be viewed as a first step toward something else – the start of a large social credit system similar to the one currently in use in China. If you think cancel culture is bad now, imagine what would happen if the collectivist mob could dump a review bomb on your social credit account and declare you untouchable. Imagine if they had the authority to prevent you from getting a job, going to the grocery store, or even accessing your money. Access to basic survival essentials would be unattainable without your cooperation with the collective.
This is what the globalists want, as they openly admitted at the start of the pandemic, and the vax passports would have been an introduction to that technocratic horror had we conservatives not stood our ground.
By 2030, you will own nothing and be content: Interesting to note that if Socialists understood economics they would not be Socialists. The “Sharing Economy” (also known as “Stakeholder Capitalism”) is a notion that has been discussed at the World Economic Forum for several years. The media has tried to propagate lies and misinformation by stating that the plan does not exist; yet, it has been freely stated.
The sharing economy is essentially a communist economy, but it has been reduced to a strange minimalism that even those who lived in the Soviet Union were spared. People live in Section 8-style housing with communal kitchens, public bathrooms, and little privacy in the structure, which is regarded as a form of commune-based lifestyle. Every piece of property is rented or borrowed.
All cars are borrowed and shared, the majority of public transportation is mass transit, and even essential personal objects like laptops, phones, and cooking utensils may be shared or borrowed. You will own nothing, according to the World Economic Forum.
It’s another matter (yours) to be happy about it.
The argument for such a society is that, for the sake of the earth, “climate change” and the flaws of consumer economics dictate that we drop our living standards to near zero and reject the hallowed concept of private ownership.
Let’s ignore the reality that carbon-based global warming is a hoax. According to the NOAA, global temperatures have barely risen by 1 DEGREE CELSIUS in the last century. For years, climate experts tried to bury or gloss over this information, but it is now available to the public. There is no evidence that global warming is caused by humans.
Since at least 1972, when the Club Of Rome issued a thesis titled ‘The Limits To Growth,’ the globalists have been plotting to use ecology as an excuse for centralization. They would publish a book called “The First Global Revolution” twenty years later. They specifically advocate utilizing global warming as a vehicle in that document:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
The quote is from Chapter 5 – The Vacuum, which discusses their views on the necessity for global governance. The phrase is rather clear; a common enemy must be conjured up in order to persuade humanity to unite under a single banner, and the elites believe that environmental catastrophe, produced by mankind itself, is the most effective motivator.
They promote the shared economy answer as if it were a novel and daring concept. However, the globalists’ ultimate goal for their Great Reset is a tidal wave reversal from individual liberty and prosperity to a very old way of doing things, similar to ancient feudalism. If you work as a peasant on land controlled by the elites or the government, you will never be wealthy.
Strangely enough, the gleeful refusal to learn even basic education and social mores seems to be leading us back to a voluntary type of Feudalism and Serfdom.
The main difference would be because peasants could not own land in a feudal empire in the past due to the class system. You won’t be able to own anything this time, including land, because desiring to own something is “selfish” and harmful to the environment.
Total Information Control: This person gained a lot of friends quickly. The truth is becoming increasingly scarce, but not quite as scarce as it will become if these elitists get their way. The globalists are far more forthright about their agenda today than they have ever been, and I believe this is because they believe they will be able to rewrite the history of today’s events with impunity after the Reset takes place. They believe they will be able to control the world of information and rewrite our cultural memory as they go.
And they are correct.
All of this is referred to as “conspiracy theory” in the mainstream media. It’s what I refer to as conspiratorial reality-much like the non-existent laptop owned by Hunter Biden. It’s difficult to deny the globalists’ own open admissions; all they can do is try to spin the facts as much as possible in order to keep the people on the fence about what has to be done, which is a purge of the globalists from our country, if not the entire planet.
If we don’t accomplish this now, nothing I say here will be remembered in the future, and no trace of the Reset plan will exist. The establishment will have erased all references to it from written history, leaving only a fantastical account of how the world fell apart and a small group of “visionary” globalists stepped up to the plate to “save” it.
And guess who gets to foot that bill?
