A small Oklahoma company is challenging a punishment, a destructive fine of $31,000 for alleged paperwork errors in their business, that is being imposed by federal bureaucrats.
Those bureaucrats, according to a report on the fight from the Institute for Justice, set themselves up as prosecutor, judge and jury, and simply leveled the punishment.
“Danny and Diana [Barbee] face devastating fines for alleged paperwork errors. The Constitution says they have the right to defend themselves against those fines in a real court—one with an independent judge and the right to a jury,” explained IJ lawyer Bob Belden.
“But small businesses like ProCraft instead face years of costly and unconstitutional administrative proceedings where employees in federal law enforcement agencies like the Department of Justice act as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury.”
Their situation is that they run ProCraft Masonry, and were accused of paperwork errors.
Now the government is demanding payment of fines of more than $31,000, without ever giving the company an opportunity to have the case heard in federal court.
“And it may never get to present its case to a jury,” the IJ warned.
The Barbees are teaming with the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit, public interest law firm, to challenge the constitutionality of an agency court system that acts as prosecutor, judge, and jury.
Danny Barbee opened ProCraft in 2010 and Diana has worked for ProCraft since those early days and runs the front office.
IJ reports, “The company focuses on residential projects and employs 11 people. The company’s problems began in 2020 when an investigator from the Department of Homeland Security showed up at their office asking to look at their employees’ I-9 forms. The I-9 form verifies the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment in the U.S.”
The DHS alleged there were “technical violations” on those forms, and imposed a fine of $31,325.70.
But the fines are being imposed without benefit of any court ruling.
“Instead, the case would be decided by agency employees in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, a costly and time-consuming process where the deck is stacked in the government’s favor,” IJ reported.
Since January 2022, not including settlements between DHS and employers, DOJ’s agency judges have ruled in favor of DHS at in all 11 cases alleging employer errors on Form I-9. The fines in those cases totaled over $2.4 million, the legal team explained.
“I worked hard to build my business and now I could lose it without ever getting a chance to have a judge and jury hear the case,” said Danny. “If I got a speeding ticket, I would get a court date. But with my livelihood on the line, it could be years before we even get a final decision from bureaucrats.”
IJ said it’s one of several similar cases it is working, including ones involving a family-owned farm in New Jersey and a landscaping company in Maryland.
This new case comes just as the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in SEC v. Jarkesy, a case where the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s similar use of in-house agency judges violates the Seventh Amendment.
IMPORTANT NOTE TO WND READERS: Believe it or not, today’s high priests of climate-change apocalypse are correct in predicting that in just a few short years, the earth will become miserable, wretched and almost uninhabitable by human beings. But the grim future they envision won’t come about because of “catastrophic climate change,” but rather, because of the implementation of their completely insane and truly catastrophic agenda.
As Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore recently admitted, “If they actually achieve Net Zero, at least 50% of the population would die of hunger and disease.” Likewise, writes energy expert and author Alex Epstein: “Today’s proposed policies to rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use would, if fully implemented, have truly apocalyptic consequences – making the world an impoverished, dangerous, and miserable place for most people.”
Question: When the scientific case for global warming apocalypse consists primarily of a 1-degree Celsius rise in temperature over more than 130 years, what explains the obsession with an imminent, climate-caused end of the world?
Although many groups have been drawn into the Climate Change Cult – from the news media (which has warned of climate catastrophe, either global warming or a “new ice age,” for over a century!), to innocent school kids indoctrinated by hysterical leftist teachers, to liberal Democrats who claim “climate change” will destroy the earth in a few years – the REAL villains are the national and global elites who KNOW the apocalyptic global warming religion is just a cruel hoax, but promote and exploit it as a means of accomplishing their ultimate goal: Transforming and ruling the world.
The heart and soul of today’s bizarre, pagan climate-change religion, and the global elites’ strategies for using it to rule all of mankind, is powerfully exposed and illuminated in the September issue of WND’s critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, an issue titled “CULT OF THE CLIMATE APOCALYPSE: The elites’ breathtaking strategy for ruling the world.” WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.
For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
This article was originally published by the WND News Center.
This post originally appeared on WND News Center.