If you are not already aware, the impeachment inquiry is a partisan sham inquiry. As we discussed previously, Democrats are in the midst of a completely partisan impeachment inquiry. The inquiry started behind closed doors and continues to be nothing more than a sham.
Need more proof? Well, Rep. Adam Schiff certainly gave that to us on Saturday. The Washington Examiner reported that Adam Schiff was refusing to allow Republicans to call what he called “sham” witnesses. On the witness list were people such as Hunter Biden, the “whistleblower,” Alexandra Chalupa and others. But Adam Schiff has stated he will not allow the sham witnesses for Republicans.
If Democrats were truly concerned about the truth in the impeachment inquiry, they would need these witnesses. They would need to prove that President Trump was incorrectly seeking an investigation into the Bidens. They would need to prove that there was no corruption or quid pro quo as Trump suggested. This would allow Democrats to prove Trump had no reason to ask for the investigation into corruption.
Democrats are not concerned about corruption by the Biden family however. The only interest Democrats have is in impeaching President Trump somehow. While I could probably continue to write about this, the whole situation surrounding the witness list continues to get better.
Democrats are really into the terminology of fact checking lately. If you remember, after Twitter said they would no longer allow political advertising, some Democrats like AOC came out in support saying if they were not going to fact check the claims this was for the best. So by fact checking, AOC means that ad claims must be approved by a liberal outlet. If it is not approved by liberals, there’s no way the statement can be true right?
So MSNBC did just this regarding the witness list. So they had a legal expert help them through this fact checking to make it legitimate right? Wrong. They had Charlie Savage from the New York Times to fact check the statements. Yes, the extremely liberal anti-Republican New York Times. This certainly seems legitimate.
If this is the kind of fact checking that Democrats demand, then fact checking is also a sham. The left is more focused on eliminating Trump than serving their constituents. If the left wants to claim this inquiry is valid, then Republicans must be allowed to call these witnesses to interview.
Without the removal of Trump’s motive, there will be a remnant of doubt in the American public’s mind. The Democrats must be able to convince the public that Trump is guilty, which takes proof. The information from the call does not give the proof needed. Removing Trump’s motive could do this, but it requires allowing Republican witnesses to testify.
Adam Schiff will continue to reject Republican witnesses. Republicans involved know this. Knowing that Democrats cannot remove the doubt about Trump’s motive is the best defense that they have to the public at the moment. Republicans will continue down this path until Democrats make up the next chapter of the sham inquiry.
You can contact JD through the Liberty Loft website or by Twitter. If you like the content you find on the Liberty Loft, consider donating to support conservative speech!